Securing Plates and Futures: West Papua’s Path to Food Resilience

Once seen as Indonesia’s most vulnerable province in terms of food access, West Papua is charting a promising path toward food security and nutrition resilience. Supported by a suite of national agencies, regional planners, and community farmers, West Papua is witnessing a transformation in how food is grown, distributed, and consumed.

“For the first time, my son eats vegetables at school—and he loves them.”
— A mother in Fakfak district, quoted in a Ministry of Education food program report

A Forested Food System in Transition

Traditionally, Papuan diets centered on sago, tubers, wild meats, and forest-foraged legumes. But over the past decade, dietary habits have shifted toward rice, chicken, tofu, and processed foods—resulting in rising under- and over-nutrition among Indigenous communities (Nurhasan et al., 2022) CIFOR-ICRAF. Recognizing this, the provincial government has joined national efforts to promote healthier nutrition and secure access to staple foods, integrating traditional and modern food systems.

Special Autonomy, or Otonomi Khusus in Indonesian, is a legal and political framework granted by the Indonesian government to the provinces of Papua and West Papua. Its purpose is to address the historical, political, and socioeconomic disparities between the central government and the indigenous Papuan population by offering a greater degree of self-governance, cultural recognition, and control over local resources. Enacted through Law No. 21 of 2001, and revised in 2021, special autonomy was intended to resolve long-standing grievances and integrate West Papua more harmoniously into the Republic of Indonesia.

Historical Context

The roots of Special Autonomy lie in West Papua’s complex history with Indonesia. Formerly a Dutch colony known as Dutch New Guinea, West Papua was integrated into Indonesia in 1969 through a controversial referendum known as the “Act of Free Choice.” Only about 1,026 handpicked Papuan representatives, under military pressure, voted to join Indonesia, sparking decades of unrest, resistance movements, and human rights concerns.

To address increasing dissatisfaction and demands for independence, the Indonesian government introduced Special Autonomy in 2001. This move came after years of national and international criticism, aiming to empower indigenous Papuans, improve public services, and recognize their distinct cultural and political identity.

Key Features of Special Autonomy

Special Autonomy provides a series of legal and administrative privileges to West Papua and Papua provinces, including:

1. Cultural and Political Recognition:
   The law acknowledges the cultural uniqueness of Papuans and their traditional customs (adat). It allows for local symbols, languages, and customary laws to be upheld alongside national legislation.
2. Local Political Authority:
   Indigenous Papuans are given priority in key political positions, including the roles of governor, regent, and mayor. Local parliaments are also encouraged to have a high proportion of indigenous representation.
3. Financial Allocation:
   Papua and West Papua receive a significantly larger share of government funds—initially 2% of the national General Allocation Fund (DAU), which was later revised in 2021 to be more performance-based. These funds are intended to support education, healthcare, infrastructure, and economic empowerment.
4. Education and Health:
   Special Autonomy prioritizes access to quality education and healthcare. It funds scholarships for Papuan students to study throughout Indonesia and abroad, while also improving local facilities.
5. Economic Development and Resource Management:
   The law allows provincial governments to have greater control over natural resources and mining royalties, although central oversight remains strong in major sectors like oil and gas.

The 2021 Revision and Controversy

After two decades of implementation, Law No. 2 of 2021 was passed to revise the original Special Autonomy framework. The revised law:

• Extended the Special Autonomy fund for another 20 years.
• Introduced performance-based funding mechanisms.
• Centralized certain governance aspects back under Jakarta’s authority.
• Created new provinces in Papua to enhance administrative reach and governance.

While the law promised to boost efficiency and transparency, it was met with mixed reactions. Many Papuans felt excluded from the revision process, and critics argued that it reinforced central control instead of promoting genuine autonomy.

According to Brill’s International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, over 110 civil society organizations opposed the revised law for bypassing local consultation processes (Brill, 2023). Conversely, the government claimed the revision aimed to combat corruption, ensure better fund utilization, and expand development to neglected regions (Antara News, 2024).

Impact and Challenges

Despite its promises, Special Autonomy’s implementation has faced multiple hurdles:

• Corruption and Mismanagement:
  Several cases have emerged involving misuse of Special Autonomy funds by local elites. Weak oversight and lack of transparency have hindered the law’s effectiveness (U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, 2023).
• Uneven Development:
  Infrastructure projects have improved connectivity, but healthcare, education, and employment remain below national averages in many Papuan areas (UNICEF Indonesia, 2022).
• Human Rights Concerns:
  Militarization and civil unrest persist, particularly in highland regions. Critics argue that development projects have not adequately addressed historical trauma and sociopolitical alienation.
• Lack of Local Participation:
  Many Papuans feel the law is implemented “for them” rather than “by them.” Without deeper engagement with local communities and traditional leaders, trust in the system remains fragile.

Looking Ahead

For Special Autonomy to truly succeed, it must move beyond policy and into practice—rooted in inclusivity, accountability, and respect for Papuan identity. Several experts and international bodies recommend the following improvements:

• Strengthen Anti-Corruption Measures:
  Increase transparency in budget allocation and involve civil society in monitoring.
• Enhance Local Participation:
  Ensure that indigenous voices guide planning and development, especially in education, environment, and land use.
• Foster Peace and Justice:
  Promote reconciliation and human rights education through community-based peacebuilding programs.
• Leverage Indigenous Knowledge:
  Align development with traditional ecological practices, which are more sustainable and culturally relevant.

Special Autonomy is not a silver bullet. But if implemented earnestly, with shared ownership and accountability, it can serve as a bridge between West Papua’s rich cultural legacy and Indonesia’s national vision.

📚 References:

• Brill. (2023). International Journal on Minority and Group Rights. brill.com
• Antara News. (2024). “VP Ma’ruf Amin outlines strategies to accelerate Papua development.” antaranews.com
• UNICEF Indonesia. (2022). Rural and Remote Education Initiative for Papuan Provinces. unicef.org
• U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre. (2023). “Special Autonomy Fund Management in Papua.” u4.no
• Wikipedia. (2024). Special Autonomy in Papua. en.wikipedia.org